Tucker Carlson holding Alp tins

What is Better? Alp or Zyn. An In-depth Look at the Competing Nicotine Pouches

Nicotine pouches have become a go-to for those seeking a smokeless, tobacco-free way to enjoy nicotine, and two brands are vying for the top spot: ZYN and ALP. ZYN has long been the king of the hill, but ALP, a brash newcomer, is making waves with bold claims of superiority. As someone who’s dug into the details, I’m here to break down the backgrounds of these brands, their similarities and differences, the controversies swirling around them, and why I think ALP is the better choice for most users. Buckle up—this is a deep dive into the world of nicotine pouches.

Background of the Companies

ZYN: The Established Giant

ZYN is the brainchild of Swedish Match, a company with deep roots in the tobacco industry. In 2022, Swedish Match was acquired by Philip Morris International, one of the world’s largest tobacco conglomerates, headquartered in Connecticut (ZYN Official). Launched in the U.S. in 2016, ZYN quickly became a household name in the nicotine pouch market, capitalizing on its tobacco-free formula and wide appeal. By 2023, it held over 70% of the U.S. nicotine pouch market, with sales soaring to 131 million cans in the first quarter of 2024 alone, an 80% increase year-over-year (NBC News). ZYN’s success stems from its sleek branding, consistent quality, and a focus on flavors tailored to American tastes, like Wintergreen and Cinnamon.

ALP: The Bold Challenger

ALP burst onto the scene in November 2024, spearheaded by conservative media personality Tucker Carlson in partnership with Turning Point Brands, a company known for its tobacco and vaping products (ALP Official). Unlike ZYN, ALP positions itself as an independent, user-driven brand, free from the grip of “big tobacco.” Carlson, once a vocal ZYN advocate, launched ALP after a falling-out with Philip Morris, citing dissatisfaction with ZYN’s dry pouches and corporate ethos (Nicokick News). ALP markets itself with a rebellious streak, promising “perfectly moist” pouches and a commitment to “a better time” for nicotine users.

Similarities and Differences

Both ZYN and ALP offer tobacco-free nicotine pouches designed to be placed between the gum and lip, delivering nicotine without the need for smoking or spitting. They cater to adults seeking a discreet, convenient nicotine experience. However, their differences are stark and worth unpacking.

Similarities

  • Tobacco-Free: Both use synthetic or tobacco-derived nicotine, free of tobacco leaf, making them a cleaner alternative to traditional smokeless tobacco (Truth Initiative).
  • Usage: Pouches are placed under the lip for up to an hour, releasing nicotine gradually.
  • Flavors and Strengths: Both offer multiple flavors and nicotine strengths to suit different preferences.
  • Target Audience: Marketed to adult nicotine users, with strict age verification (ZYN FAQ).

Differences

FeatureZYNALP
Flavors10 (e.g., Wintergreen, Spearmint, Cinnamon, Coffee)5 (Chilled Mint, Mountain Wintergreen, Refreshing Chill, Tropical Fruit, Sweet Nectar)
Nicotine Strengths3mg, 6mg3mg, 6mg, 9mg
Pouches per Can1520
Pouch TextureDry, slower releaseMoist, faster release
Price per Can~$5.29–$5.59 (MSRP $5.64)~$3.99–$4.99 (MSRP $4.99)
Price per Pouch~$0.37~$0.25
OwnershipPhilip Morris InternationalTucker Carlson/Turning Point Brands
Market PresenceEstablished since 2016Launched in 2024
  • Flavors: ZYN’s 10 flavors offer more variety, catering to diverse tastes. ALP’s five flavors, while fewer, are praised for their intensity due to the moist texture (Nicokick Comparison).
  • Strengths: ALP’s 9mg option is a game-changer for users seeking a stronger hit, unavailable in ZYN’s U.S. lineup (Northerner Comparison).
  • Pouch Count and Price: ALP’s 20 pouches per can at a lower price point (~$4.99 vs. ZYN’s ~$5.50) make it more cost-effective, with a per-pouch cost of $0.25 compared to ZYN’s $0.37.
  • Moisture: ALP’s moist pouches deliver faster nicotine and flavor release, enhancing the user experience, while ZYN’s dry pouches provide a slower, more sustained effect (Vapebeat Review).
  • Branding: ZYN benefits from its established reputation and FDA approval for 20 products (FDA News). ALP, however, appeals to those skeptical of big tobacco, emphasizing independence and American-made pride.

Controversies

ZYN: Underage Use and Regulatory Scrutiny

ZYN’s meteoric rise has not been without controversy. Its popularity among Gen-Z, fueled by social media “Zynfluencers” and over 700 million TikTok views, has raised alarms about underage use (ABC News). Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for investigations into ZYN’s marketing practices, citing risks to youth neurological development (Washington Examiner). The FDA has issued warnings to retailers for underage sales and noted that 1.5% of middle and high school students used nicotine pouches in 2024, though this is lower than e-cigarette use (FDA Warning). A 2022 study also found cancer-causing chemicals in some ZYN samples, though at lower levels than cigarettes (American Lung Association). Additionally, a 2024 shortage sparked consumer outcry, highlighting supply chain issues (Nicokick Shortage).

ALP: The Carlson Factor

As a newer brand, ALP has not yet faced significant product-specific controversies. However, its association with Tucker Carlson, a polarizing figure, introduces a unique dynamic. Carlson’s launch of ALP followed a public spat with Philip Morris after they rebuffed his endorsement and criticized his unverified claims about ZYN’s benefits (GQ Article). A Nicokick survey suggests Carlson’s persona may both attract and repel consumers, with some boycotting ZYN in support of ALP (Nicokick Survey). The brand’s “Bye ZYN, Buy ALP” slogan and anti-corporate rhetoric have stirred debate, potentially alienating users who prefer ZYN’s neutrality.

Why ALP is Better

I’m throwing my weight behind ALP, and here’s why it stands out:

  1. Better Value: With 20 pouches per can versus ZYN’s 15, ALP delivers more bang for your buck. At roughly $4.99 per can (or $3.99 on some retailers like Nicokick), ALP’s per-pouch cost is significantly lower than ZYN’s $5.50 average (Nicokick ZYN).
  2. Higher Strength Option: ALP’s 9mg pouches cater to users craving a stronger nicotine hit, a gap ZYN doesn’t fill in the U.S. market. This flexibility makes ALP more versatile for experienced users (Northerner Comparison).
  3. Moist Pouches, Superior Experience: User reviews consistently praise ALP’s moist pouches for their comfort, longer-lasting flavor (up to 3 hours for some flavors), and faster nicotine delivery. ZYN’s dry pouches, while preferred by some for gradual release, often feel less vibrant (Vapebeat Review).
  4. Independence from Big Tobacco: ALP’s partnership with Turning Point Brands and its “made in the USA” ethos (though some production occurs in India) resonate with consumers wary of Philip Morris’s corporate shadow (Reddit Post).
  5. Premium Packaging: ALP’s optional aluminum travel tins ($29.99–$89.99) offer a discreet, high-quality alternative to ZYN’s plastic cans, with a satisfying click-lock mechanism (Vapebeat Review).

While ZYN’s 10 flavors give it an edge for variety seekers, ALP’s five flavors are no slouches, with standouts like Mountain Wintergreen earning rave reviews for their bold, icy profiles (Nicobolt Review). ZYN’s established presence and FDA approval are notable, but ALP’s focus on user experience—more pouches, moister texture, and stronger options—feels like a breath of fresh air in a market dominated by corporate giants.

With all that said ALP’s quality has been of concern from some users reporting brown spots, mishandling, or mispackaging of the product which is allegedly sourced or “assembled” in India. Personally, the quality has been steady for me, but I’m still doing a look over before throwing in an upper decky.

Health-wise, both products carry nicotine’s addictive risks, and ZYN’s dry pouches may pose a slightly lower immediate absorption rate, potentially reducing intensity for new users (Truth Initiative). However, ALP’s quality and value outweigh these nuances for most adult users. As ALP is new, it may expand its flavor range in time, closing the gap with ZYN.

WARNING: This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.

If you’re after a nicotine pouch that delivers more pouches, stronger options, and a richer, moister experience, ALP is the clear winner. Its user-centric design, cost-effectiveness, and independence from big tobacco make it a compelling choice. ZYN remains a solid option for those who prioritize flavor variety and brand familiarity, but for me, ALP’s bold approach and superior quality steal the show. Say goodbye to dry, lackluster pouches and hello to ALP’s vibrant, satisfying ride.

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *